Comments for Intelligent Scoring http://cnis.wordpress.com More value. Less noise. Every day. Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:45:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Terms and Definitions by Fascinater’s Weblog http://cnis.wordpress.com/terms-and-definitions/#comment-1096 Fascinater’s Weblog Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:45:00 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/terms-and-definitions/#comment-1096 [...] This very site, WordPress, defines online communities nicely, as, “A community (group of people who come together around a common purpose, goal, or interest) wh... [...] [...] This very site, WordPress, defines online communities nicely, as, “A community (group of people who come together around a common purpose, goal, or interest) wh… [...]

]]> Comment on The New Form of Media by Jeff Block http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-96 Jeff Block Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:22:33 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-96 Yes, it's WordPress. Yes, it’s WordPress.

]]> Comment on The New Form of Media by Mold Remover http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-95 Mold Remover Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:22:34 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-95 Is this a wordpress blog? or some other software? Is this a wordpress blog? or some other software?

]]> Comment on The Launguage of Valuation by indianglory http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-7 indianglory Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:03:24 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-7 nice, very nice nice, very nice

]]> Comment on The New Form of Media by Jeff Block http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-6 Jeff Block Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:28:32 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/the-new-form-of-media/#comment-6 Discovered an <a href="http://www.pronetadvertising.com/articles/introduction-to-social-media-optimization.html" rel="nofollow">excellent article on this topic</a>. In his blog, Cameron Olthuis writes the emerging phenomenon called "Social Media Optimization" (or SMO). This is the analogy to Search Engine Optimization for the new media we're discussing. It's about maximizing your "findableness" on the World Live Web.  Olthuis' article is also riddled with links to other related topics.  You should check it out. Discovered an excellent article on this topic. In his blog, Cameron Olthuis writes the emerging phenomenon called “Social Media Optimization” (or SMO). This is the analogy to Search Engine Optimization for the new media we’re discussing. It’s about maximizing your “findableness” on the World Live Web.  Olthuis’ article is also riddled with links to other related topics.  You should check it out.

]]> Comment on The Launguage of Valuation by Griffin http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-5 Griffin Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:52:58 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-5 Jeff, With regards to using the data on the semantic level, I wanted to clarify my question. RDF's main goal is to facilitate the sharing of data by agreeing on semantics. Meaning, two applications can process the same data just by agreeing on the semantics. My question was really more along these lines. Does CN have any intentions on sharing semantics so that others may use the data in whatever fashion they chose? If not, I am not sure what the semantics buy you. Without using the semantics to enable automated processing of the data by more than one entity, it's just like any other internal schema of a system. Though I suppose there is value if there are several internal systems sharing data, but I didn't think that's what you described above. Jeff,

With regards to using the data on the semantic level, I wanted to clarify my question.

RDF’s main goal is to facilitate the sharing of data by agreeing on semantics. Meaning, two applications can process the same data just by agreeing on the semantics. My question was really more along these lines. Does CN have any intentions on sharing semantics so that others may use the data in whatever fashion they chose?

If not, I am not sure what the semantics buy you. Without using the semantics to enable automated processing of the data by more than one entity, it’s just like any other internal schema of a system. Though I suppose there is value if there are several internal systems sharing data, but I didn’t think that’s what you described above.

]]> Comment on The Launguage of Valuation by Jeff Block http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-4 Jeff Block Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:29:24 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-4 The similarity you point out comes from the fact that both Capable Networks and RDF are both calling on our collective knowledge of language to solve very different problems. Both efforts are looking for a very simple way to represent a very complex problem. For RDF, it's a descriptive language for knowledge management in general. For CN, it's a descriptive language for representing actions observed in a community setting. There are clear knowledge management implications to our system, but we are not somehow using RDF's methods. Both CN and RDF are leveraging the grammatical rules of the English language to make a difficult problem more manageable. We do make use of the data on a semantic level. Each sentence in the valuation language has meaning. Each sentence is observed by the CVE, and the meaning is aggregated (interpreted), so that value judgments can be made. The semantics are the core of our system. The similarity you point out comes from the fact that both Capable Networks and RDF are both calling on our collective knowledge of language to solve very different problems. Both efforts are looking for a very simple way to represent a very complex problem. For RDF, it’s a descriptive language for knowledge management in general. For CN, it’s a descriptive language for representing actions observed in a community setting. There are clear knowledge management implications to our system, but we are not somehow using RDF’s methods. Both CN and RDF are leveraging the grammatical rules of the English language to make a difficult problem more manageable.

We do make use of the data on a semantic level. Each sentence in the valuation language has meaning. Each sentence is observed by the CVE, and the meaning is aggregated (interpreted), so that value judgments can be made. The semantics are the core of our system.

]]> Comment on The Launguage of Valuation by Griffin http://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-3 Griffin Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:20:57 +0000 https://cnis.wordpress.com/2006/08/08/the-launguage-of-valuation/#comment-3 Jeff, Your 'Subject verb object' definition is very similar to RDF's idea of a "triple" ( http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/01/24/rdf.html?page=2 ) Was this intentional and you does Capable have any intentions of making use of this data on a semantic level? - Griffin Jeff,

Your ‘Subject verb object’ definition is very similar to RDF’s idea of a “triple” ( http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/01/24/rdf.html?page=2 )

Was this intentional and you does Capable have any intentions of making use of this data on a semantic level?

- Griffin

]]>